Ícone do site Revista Agrária Acadêmica

Cedar vascular flora of Djebel Maadid. Floristic analysis – Conservation

Agrarian Academic Journal

agrariacad.com

doi: 10.32406/v6n6/2023/68-84/agrariacad

 

Cedar vascular flora of Djebel Maadid. Floristic analysis – Conservation. Flora vascular de cedro de Djebel Maadid. Análise florística – Conservação.

 

Aida Radjai1,3, Djamel Sarri1, Abdelghani Zedam2,3*

 

1- Nature and Life Sciences Department, Mohamed BOUDIAF University, PO Box 166 Echbilia, M’Sila 28000, Algeria
2- Agricultural Sciences Department, Mohamed BOUDIAF University, PO Box 166 Echbilia, M’Sila 28000, Algeria
3- Research Laboratory of Biodiversity and Biotechnological Techniques for the Vegetal Resources Valorization (BTB_VRV), Mohamed BOUDIAF University, PO Box 166 Echbilia, M’Sila 28000, Algeria
* Corresponding author. E-mail: abdelghani.zedam@univ-msila.dz

 

Abstract

 

The study region belongs to Cedrus atlantica Manetti formation, which is a North Africa endemic species. It is situated at Djebel Maadid, southern Bordj-Bou-Arreridj province, Algeria. To preserve this community, a flora inventory is important. We adopted a systematic-subjective non-probability sampling method in 30 surveys. The results revealed 108 species distributed among 91 genera and belonging to 34 botanical families. The analysis, including similarity and detrended correspondence analysis, identified various groups of plants-samples that demonstrate different environmental states linked to distinct stationarity. The species richness in particular sites can play a local role in the in-situ conservation of plants and habitats and must be registered for an urgent awareness situation.

Keywords: Atlas cedar. Inventory. Numerical analysis. Preservation. North Africa.

 

 

Resumo

 

A região de estudo pertence à formação Cedrus atlántica Manetti, que é uma espécie endêmica do Norte da África. Está situada em Djebel Maadid, no sul da província de Bordj-Bou-Arreridj, na Argélia. Para preservar esta comunidade é importante um inventário da flora. Adotamos um método de amostragem sistemático-subjetivo não probabilístico em 30 inquéritos. Os resultados revelaram 108 espécies distribuídas em 91 gêneros e pertencentes a 34 famílias botânicas. A análise, incluindo análise de similaridade e correspondencia sem tendência, identificou vários grupos de amostras de plantas que demonstram diferentes estados ambientais ligados a estacionariedade distinta. A riqueza de espécies em determinados locais pode desempeñar um papel local na conservação in-situ de plantas e habitats e deve ser registrada para uma situação de sensibilização urgente.

Palavras-chave: Cedro atlas. Inventário. Análise numérica. Preservação, Norte da África.

 

 

Introduction

 

The recognition of the flora and plant diversity in a specific area is the essential foundation and starting point for any conservation effort (QUÉZEL, 1991). It constitutes an indispensable method to achieve the principle of sustainable development. The Atlas cedar exists in a spontaneous state in North Africa: Algeria and Morocco (BOUDY, 1955). In Algeria, we find it in central and eastern regions in different bioclimatic situations where the surface covered by cedar is very limited and disjointed (BENTOUATI, 2008). Its surface has further decreased (QUÉZEL, 1998), and Rabhi et al. (2018) announce 33,000 hectares.

The Atlas cedar has always attracted great interest as an important species given its ecological importance and numerous forestry qualities, such as low flammability, production of high-quality wood, and resistance to climatic stress and drought (RABHI et al., 2018). Despite its significant ecological value, this species is subject to degradation. This condition leads the entire forest, with its progressively thinning tree layers, to evolve towards a plant structure of the preforest and maquis type (QUÉZEL, 1998) and may even reach a steppe-like state in the case of total degradation (EL BAKKALI, 2020). The causes of this phenomenon are linked to climatic disturbances (drought, water stress, Saharan influence), the nature of certain substrates with low water retention capacity (BENTOUATI; BARITEAU, 2006), and finally, anthropogenic actions manifested through overgrazing, uncontrolled exploitation, and illegal cutting and collecting.

Our study focuses on a biodiversity assessment and spatial distribution of the cedar flora in the Djebel Maadid forest (Djebel in Arabic means Mountain) in the southern Bordj-Bou-Arreridj province (Northeastern Algeria). This aims to evaluate the ecological conditions for plant protection and conservation by conducting an inventory and proposing a method to protect the existing flora.Haut du formulaire

 

Materials and methods

 

Study area and prospecting sites

 

The study area is situated in the Bordj-Bou-Arreridj province in Northeastern Algeria. Its territory is positioned between the high plains in the North and the Tellian Atlas Mountains in the South. Our study specifically focuses on the southern part of the Bordj-Bou-Arreridj province, precisely in the mountainous region of Djebel Maadid. This area is located southeast of Ghafsitane village in the El Ach locality and southwest of Ouled Aissa village in the Rabta locality (Figure 1).

The prevailing climate in the area is subhumid, characterized by cold winters. Annual precipitation averages around 470 mm at an altitude of 1600 m (Bordj-Bou-Arreridj Meteorological Station). The soil in the cedar forest grove is skeletal, with common rock outcroppings. It predominantly rests on marl-limestone and dolomite limestone.

 

Sampling

 

For the flora inventory at Djebel Maadid, we employed a non-probability mixed sampling approach, incorporating both subjective and systematic sampling methods (ZEDAM, 2015; ZEDAM; FENNI, 2021; MERABTI et al., 2022). In our case, we based our approach on the characteristics of the vegetation facets in the cedar forest (physiognomy). The surveys were conducted during the spring-summer season in May-July 2021. We utilized the minimum area method (GUINOCHET, 1973), which determines the area required for a floristic sample (LACOSTE, SALANON, 2005). This methodology has been applied by various authors, such as Hammada (2007) in the study of Morocco’s wetlands vegetation; Hamel et al. (2013) regarding the rare and endemic vascular flora of the Edough peninsula (Northeastern Algeria); Zedam (2015) focusing on endemic flora in the Chott El Hodna wetland (North Algeria); Zedam; Fenni (2021) in an advanced research on vascular flora in the highlands of Algeria; Larbi et al. (2021) concerning the floristic and phytogeographical diversity of a cedar forest in Djurdjura (North Algeria); and Souahi et al. (2022) exploring the variation in plant diversity along a watershed in a semi-arid region (Northeastern Algeria).

 

Figure 1 – Study area of Djebel Maadid.

 

For each encountered species in any survey, we assigned a semi-quantitative coefficient using the abundance-dominance scale (BRAUN-BLANQUET et al., 1952; GILLET, 2000). The Braun-Blanquet et al. (1952) scale is as follows: 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, and +. The sample areas varied from 200 to 400 m2, as recommended for forestry groups according to Guinochet (1973), Géhu; Rivas-Martinez (1981), Ozenda (1982) and Meddour (2011).

The surveys were conducted based on topographical factors and the relative means of determination, including latitude, altitude, and longitude determined by GPS, along with exposure established by a compass.

All encountered species were identified using references such as the new flora of Algeria and southerly desert regions by Quézel, Santa (1962; 1963); flora of the Sahara by Ozenda (2004); synonymic index of the North Africa flora by Dobignard; Chatelain (2010-2013) and the database “Euro + MedPlantbase” available at https://www.emplantbase.org/. The taxa nomenclature follows the International Plant Names Index (IPNI, 2023) available at https://www.ipni.org/. Geographic distribution areas (chorology) were determined using the cited floras, and species life-forms were defined by Raunkiaer (1934), with additional determination through in-situ observations according to Emberger (1966). Voucher specimens were deposited at the laboratory of Biodiversity and Biotechnological Techniques for the Vegetal Resources Valorization at Mohamed BOUDIAF University, M’Sila – Algeria.

 

Data management and numerical analysis

 

After presenting the survey characteristics, our data analysis initially focused on an overview of floristic analysis (taxonomic richness, chorology, and life-forms), followed by an assessment of the disturbance degree. For these analyses, we utilized the Excel for Windows 2013 software. The disturbance degree for a vegetal community is expressed by the perturbation index (PI), as defined by Loisel, Gomila (1993) and applied by many authors to understand and quantify the impact of anthropogenic actions on floristic diversity. Its value takes into account the existing number of two life-form species: therophyte and chamaephyte, as follows (1):

 

 (1)

 

Finally, a numerical analysis focused on the Sørensen-Dice’s similarity index and detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) was conducted using the free program Paleontological Statistics (PAST), version 4.13. The distribution of the cedar’s samples and the flora zones conservation were performed by using arcGIS program – Version 10.2 (ESRI).

It’s important to note that in these analyses, we operated using binary data for the encountered species, as outlined by Zedam, Fenni (2021), Marcon (2022) and Hammer (2023). Similarly, for group comparisons, opposing evaluation, and intelligent automation and soft computing, the similarity analysis was employed following the methods of Shah et al. (2023) and Gnanakumari, Vijayalakshmi (2023).

Note that the binary data for the species were obtained by converting the abundance-dominance, which is a semi-quantitative coefficient attributed to the species encountered in the samples, into a qualitative coefficient indicating presence or absence (GILLET, 2000).

 

Results and discussion

 

  1. Surveys characteristics

 

After exploring our region, we conducted 30 samples with altitudes ranging from 1510 m to 1830 m. We carried out an inventory of the entire vascular flora present in each sample (Table 1).

 

Table 1 -Surveys characteristics of Djebel Maadid cedar forest
Samples
Exposure
Latitude North (°)
Longitude East (°)
Altitude (m)
Samples
Exposure
Latitude North (°)
Longitude East (°)
Altitude (m)
R1
North
35,8694
4,7520
1580
R16
North
35,8675
4,7499
1630
R2
North
35,8685
4,7507
1600
R17
North
35,8664
4,7521
1670
R3
West
35,8620
4,7443
1780
R18
North
35,8667
4,7542
1690
R4
West
35,8630
4,7386
1630
R19
North
35,8687
4,7496
1590
R5
East
35,8685
4,7564
1630
R20
North
35,8672
4,7530
1650
R6
East
35,8643
4,7341
1540
R21
North
35,8677
4,7515
1630
R7
East
35,8667
4,7675
1760
R22
North
35,8660
4,7500
1690
R8
East
35,8627
4,7478
1830
R23
North
35,8652
4,7506
1690
R9
East
35,8704
4,7597
1650
R24
West
35,8646
4,7407
1690
R10
East
35,8718
4,7589
1600
R25
West
35,8649
4,7443
1750
R11
East
35,8719
4,7591
1630
R26
West
35,8631
4,7449
1800
R12
East
35,8673
4,7588
1630
R27
West
35,8619
4,7451
1800
R13
East
35,8703
4,7624
1690
R28
West
35,8643
4,7422
1740
R14
East
35,8662
4,7325
1510
R29
West
35,8627
4,7420
1720
R15
East
35,8614
4,7334
1670
R30
West
35,8591
4,7396
1670

 

Our surveys are depicted in the studied area map (Figure 2), where the exploration covered homogeneous forest areas. In these areas, samples were collected and the existing flora was collected.

 

Figure 2 – Cedar’s samples of Djebel Maadid.

 

  1. Floristic analysis

2.1.Taxonomic richness

 

The results revealed that the samples yielded 108 species, belonging to over 91 genera and 34 botanical families. The majority of families, seven in total, encompass more than 65% (71 species) of the entire flora: Asteraceae (22 species), Brassicaceae (12 species), Poaceae (10 species), Apiaceae (08 species), Lamiaceae (07 species), Caryophyllaceae, and Fabaceae (06 species each). The remaining families each have between 1 to 3 species.

In this context, Quézel (1964) noted that the most significant family in the Algerian flora is Asteraceae, which aligns with our results. Additionally, we observe that twenty families are singleton; meaning they are represented by a single species per family (MAGURRAN, 2005).

 

2.2. Chorology

 

If we consider the Mediterranean element in its broad sense, the species encountered in our study amount to 53, representing more than 49% of the total flora. The remaining species are from other origins, numerically less significant. The Transition group comprises 36 species (33.33%), while the Nordic and Cosmopolitan groups each have 15 (13.89%) and 04 species (3.70%), respectively.

The dominance of the Mediterranean origin, as observed in our study, has been reported in numerous works conducted in neighboring regions. For example, Guechi (2022) focused on floristic and ethnobotanical studies in the Maadid mountains of M’Sila, Yaici (2020) conducted research on medicinal plants in the Sétif Tell region (East Algeria), Bounab (2020) explored plant diversity in the Hodna region of M’Sila, and Sedjar (2012) studied biodiversity and vegetation dynamics in the extreme East of the Hodna Mountains in the Boutaleb forest ecosystem (Sétif).

Finally, it is important to note that the most xeric cedar forests in Algeria, such as the cedars of Aurès, Belezma, and Hodna, are situated in the Mauretanian Steppe Domain, where rainfall is very irregular and varies from 450 to 950 mm (YAHI et al., 2008).

 

2.3. Life-form

 

The results of our species life-form are grouped as follows: Therophyte “Th” (46 species), Hemicryptophyte “He” (29 species), Chamaephyte “Ch” (14 species), Phanerophyte “Ph” (10 species), and Geophyte “Ge” (09 species). The most dominant life form is the therophyte, representing more than 42% of all species. The less represented life-forms are the Phanerophyte and the Geophyte.

The distribution of life-forms in the Djebel Maadid area follows the pattern: Th > He > Ch > Ph > Ge. However, in the main forest of the studied cedar’s stations (Tellian and Saharan Atlas), as reported by Yahi et al. (2008), the pattern is: He > Th > Ch > Ph > Ge. The dominance of the life-forms Therophyte and Hemicryptophyte in our case study aligns with the findings of Beghami et al. (2013) in their work on thuriferous Juniper (Juniperus thurifera L.) in the Aurès area (Algeria), specifically concerning the species of the forestry community Cedar-Thuriferous Juniper localized at high altitudes. This observation reflects the specific characteristics of the species and the prevailing ecological conditions in our study area:

 

The observations reported by Yahi et al. (2008) regarding the high frequency of therophytes in Algerian cedar forests, indicating disturbance through activities like clearing and grazing, are notable. This dominance of the therophyte life-form is often seen as an adaptive response in arid areas, as noted by Negre (1966). This fact translates the aridity of the environment, as highlighted by Negadi et al. (2014). Zedam (2015) explains the abundance of “therophytes” reflecting a pioneer stage linked to the climate. The prevalence of therophytes serves as an ecological indicator of human activities and local climatic conditions. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for formulating effective conservation and management strategies for these unique ecosystems.

In the Hodna Mountains and nearby areas, the dominance of the therophytes is apparent. This state has been reported by many authors as Kaabeche (1990); Sedjar (2012); Zedam (2015); Bounab (2020); Yaici (2020) and Zedam; Fenni (2021).

 

  1. Perturbation index

 

The Perturbation Index (PI) is a measure that depends on the number of therophytes and chamaephytes, providing a quantification of therophytization in an environment (LOISEL, GAMILA, 1993). In our case study, with 46 therophytes and 14 chamaephytes, the calculated PI is 55.56%.This value is higher compared to the works of Beghami et al. (2013) : PI= 55,26 to 61,86 %  for the degraded formations and 28,13 to 45,50 % for the least ones; Bounab (2020): PI= 57,75 ± 1,48 %; Yaici (2020) and Guechi (2022) gave each a PI = 40%; and finally Larbi et al. (2021): PI= 27%. These differences may be explain the local conditions, the management practices, and the ecological contexts.

When the perturbation index (PI) is higher, the plant group is more degraded and results from a high proportion of identified therophytic and chamaephytic species. This state reflects the opening of plant formations (HEBRARD et al., 1995; BELHACINI et al., 2016) hence a lesser representation of sizeable perennial species, in this case the phanerophytes (sylvatic formation). This fact reveals, in first an anthropogenic pressure on the vegetation (QUÉZEL, BARBERO, 1990), and on the other the drought which affects negatively the environment and reflects degradation and biodiversity loss (MULUNEH, 2021).

 

  1. Numerical analysis

4.1. Sørensen-Dice’s similarity index

 

The similarity, with values ranging from 0 to 1, shows the possible link or connections between species groups (MARCON, 2022) or to compare associations (HAMMER et al., 2001). A high similarity value suggests that two groups share a similar floristic composition or ecological conditions (WALTER, 2006). Our analysis shows two distinct groups labeled as “1” and “2” (Figure 3). Each group may have high similaritiy in floristic composition or the same ecological characteristics that distinguish it from the other.

 

Figure 3 – Samples similarity of Djebel Maadid cedar forest.

 

The first group (1) comprises samples with values exceeding 0.50, extending well beyond. These samples include: R1, R2, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22, and R23. This state indicates a strong similarity within this group (KOLEFF et al., 2003; MARCON, 2022). The group occupies a microclimate area protected to the east and west by high-altitude ridge lines and faces northward. This positioning results in significant rainfall and cool winters. It’s worth noting that Zedam (1991) has identified this part of the forest as belonging to the highest class of wood production. These areas of the samples can play a crucial role in conserving plant biodiversity, particularly given the existing threat in the cedar forest, primarily from overgrazing.

The second group (2), more numerous and highly heterogeneous. Basyuni, Jayusman (2019) highlight that the cluster analysis considers species variation, serving as an ecological indicator for the community. This group comprises samples with lower similarity compared to the first group, recording values below 0.40. Noteworthy samples in this group include: R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R24, R25, R26, R27, R28, R29, and R30. The samples are situated in areas with two exposures (East and West) and are located in an overgrazed region. In one part, they rest on rocky and superficial terrain, while in the other, they receive less precipitation and experience cold winters. According to Zedam (1991), this part of the forest falls into two wood production zones: the east area in the moderately productive class and the west area in the least productive one.

 

4.2. Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA)

 

As stipulated by Cano et al. (2019), the Figure 4 below indicates the presence of two “Species-Samples” groups.

 

Figure 4 – DCA ordination of samples and species of Djebel Maadid cedar forest.

 

This occurrence arises from the characteristic species associated with each group (FENNANE, 1988). The first group (A) encompasses the following samples: R1, R2, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22, and R23, featuring species dependent on ecologically specific stations. The floristic composition of this group is specialized and belongs to sylvatic physiognomy, including species such as Daphne laureola L., Viola munbyana Boiss. et Reut., and Phlomis bovei de Noé. These species indicate a humid atmosphere and fairly deep soil (MEDIOUNI, YAHI, 1989), as specified by Zedam (1991), this part of the forest provides potential conditions for the cedar’s trees to yield more wood production than other areas. On the other hand, Solomou et al. (2023) note that Bellis sylvestris Cirillo characterizes a state of ecological condition in which it adapts to grow in well-lit but also partially shaded positions, as well as in habitats with moderate nutrient availability. Additionally, Karahan (2020) reports that the genus “Bellis” colonizes moist habitats, often localized in forests. This group of samples is considered a sylvatic set, where its species are relatively more preserved from overgrazing and human aggression.

The second group (B) of “Species-Samples” comprises the samples: R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R24, R25, R26, R27, R28, R29, and R30, where particular species are encountered, exhibiting unique ecology in response to altitude variation. This group can be divided into two subgroups: B1 and B2. Subgroup B1, including the samples R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, and R15, forms two smaller subgroups, all oriented towards the East. The first is located in the eastern study area with the samples R5, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, and R13; the other includes the samples R6, R14, and R15 situated in the western part of the study area. Firstly, this subgroup contains forest species such as Bupleurum montanum Coss. & Durieu, an endemic species that is threatened and requires urgent protection, as suggested by Bounar et al. (2021). Rhamnus alaternus L., a sclerophyll shrub characterizing Mediterranean evergreen oak woodland, is mentioned by Ciccarelli et al. (2016). Sambucus ebulus L., a species indicating disturbed areas, is highlighted by Fanelli et al. (2008). Secondly, there are ruderal-weed species like Hordeum murinum L., identified by Baghestani et al. (2008) as a problematic weed affecting cereal crops, and Muscari comosum (L.) Mill., a perennial weed in North Africa. Haliniarz et al. (2021) considered it an endangered species in Poland. This subgroup is regarded as a sylvatic set, with its area subject to various forms of human aggression.

The subgroup B2 includes species typically considered as weeds and those specific to a particular ecosystem. These species are found in the following samples: R3, R4, R24, R25, R26, R27, R28, R29, and R30, all oriented toward the West exposure.

Among the weed species, Senecio vulgaris L. is encountered, occurring in both ruderal and agricultural habitats (LEISS; MÜLLER-SCHÄRER, 2001). Eryngium campestre L. is considered a problem for pastoral value in Baicoi, Romania, as noted by Jalobã et al. (2018). Regarding Bromus tectorum L., it is identified as a winter annual invasive species in the Great Basin site (USA) by Bradford; Lauenroth (2006). Lastly, Erodium cicutarium (L.) L’Hér. requires weed management due to its invasive potential of lands (HIEN LE et al., 2021).

Finally, species dependent on a particular ecosystem at high altitude, often open or semi-open with groves of sylvatic physiognomy, include Erinacea anthyllis Link and Bupleurum spinosum Gouan, identified as spiny xerophytic plants by Taleb; Fennane (2016). Juniperus oxycedrus L., reported by Cano-Ortiz et al. (2021), is a shrub found in dry, sunny, and rocky environments. This subgroup is considered a sub-sylvatic set, with its area subject to overgrazing.

The figure 4 allows us to observe three ecological gradients concerning executive samples, encountered species, and characteristics of the prospect areas. The first gradient is humidity, increasing from subgroup B2, situated in the west exposure, to group A, located in the north exposure. The second gradient is altitude, ascending from group A at low altitude (with an altitudinal average of 1642 m) and subgroup B1 at moderate altitude (with an altitudinal average exceeding 1649 m) to subgroup B2, found at high altitude (with an altitudinal average exceeding 1731 m). The last gradient is temperature, decreasing from group A to group B, which encompasses the high-altitude areas.Haut du formulaire

 

  1. Perspective of plant conservation

 

The analysis of plant distribution in the study area and the ecological characteristics of the corresponding samples reveals three areas of plant biodiversity that strive to be preserved from overgrazing, human aggression, and other negative impacts (figures 5, 6).

 

Figure 5 – Flora zones to preserve in Djebel Maadid cedar forest.
Zone I: Center of the studied area
Zone II a: East of the studied area
Zone II b: West of the studied area
Zone III: Center West of the studied area
Figure 6 – Forest zones in Djebel Maadid cedar forest (Photos: Radjai, 2022).

 

These forest zones of flora are delimited, illustrated, and characterized as follows:

 

Zone I: This central zone of the studied area is oriented to the North. It features a sylvatic physiognomy, with its species predominantly found in this part rather than others. These species are relatively more preserved from human pressure due to the challenging access to this area, attributed to the North-South orientation cliffs situated in the East and West, along with the dense green oak scrub located at the bottom (North side). In this context, Angelstam et al. (2023) assert that biodiversity conservation can be achieved by establishing protected forest areas. This zone can play a role as a promoter of plant species to the bordering zones.

 

Zone II: It is situated in the East (Zone IIa) and West (Zone IIb) of the studied area. This zone exhibits a sylvatic physiognomy, with its exposure oriented to the East, and its area is subjected to anthropogenic activities. It is crucial to acknowledge that among the threats to biodiversity, the loss of “habitat” is associated with human activity (VERMA et al., 2020). In this zone, we propose to prioritize preservation initially and subsequently advocate for overgrazing regulation in specific areas, especially those identified as vulnerable.

 

Zone III: A final zone located in the center-west with a west orientation. The surveyed area exhibits a sub-sylvatic physiognomy on one hand, and on the other, it is often open or semi-open with groves of sylvatic physiognomy growing on a soil that is frequently skeletal, with rocks outcropping. The local biodiversity in this area is susceptible to overgrazing and human aggression. It’s important to note that overgrazing, defined as the disrespect for the animal load, leads to the loss of plant protection from climate aggressiveness, and land use practices are also considered partial causes of biodiversity loss (SOULÉ, 1991). The floral richness of this zone and its biotope must be urgently preserved to ensure its sustainability because conservation of biodiversity in such environments will result in protected areas that welcome and maintain unmodified sites (SERGIO; PEDRINI, 2007). As recommended by Shaheen et al. (2023), for effective in-situ conservation, it is necessary to establish wild nurseries to retain the potential of threatened plants in their natural habitats initially and then plan future reforestation to create the desired forest atmosphere.

 

Conclusion

 

The vascular flora inventory in the study area of the cedar forest at Djebel Maadid, situated in the southern Bordj-Bou-Arreridj province and at the Northern face of the Hodna Mountains (North Algeria), encompassed 30 samples, revealing a total richness of 108 species, with the Asteraceae family dominating. This flora is chorologically linked to the Mediterranean origin and appears to be dominated by the therophyte life-form, indicating a higher perturbation index and revealing anthropogenic pressure along with other factors such as drought. Numerical data analysis of this flora delineates two broad sets of plant samples, showcasing different environmental states related to temperature and humidity in relation to altitude, and linked to the characteristics of the samples. The special and characteristic species, along with the richness rate encountered in plant-sample groups, especially in subgroups, identified three areas. The first is considered a sylvatic set, relatively more preserved from human pressure. The second is characterized as a sylvatic set subjected to anthropogenic activities, and the last is categorized as a sub-sylvatic set, susceptible to overgrazing and human aggression.

To conserve the entire existing flora in-situ, the first and second areas (if the second is rapidly preserved from negative impacts) can serve as promoters, upholders, and invaders of neighboring areas with their richness and special species. The third area must be shielded from anthropogenic activities. Effective management practices should be implemented to ensure their continued existence and sustainability for future generations.

 

Interest conflicts

 

There was no conflict of interest between the authors.

 

Authors’ contributions

 

All authors contributed equally for this work.

 

Acknowledgements

 

We are very much grateful to Dr. D. Khoudour, Miss. Z. Bidi & M. A. Djahich for their helps. We don’t forget Pr F. Mimeche for his reading of this manuscript.

 

Bibliographic references

 

ANGELSTAM, P.; BUSH, T.; MANTON, M. Challenges and solutions for forest biodiversity conservation in Sweden: assessment of policy, implementation outputs, and consequences. Land, v. 12, n. 5, p. 1-58, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12051098

BAGHESTANI, M. A.; ZAND, E.; MESGARAN, M. B.; VEYSSI, M.; POURAZR, R.; MOHAMMADIPOUR, M. Control of weed barley species in winter wheat with sulfosulfuron at different rates and times of application. Weed Biology and Management, v. 8, n. 3, p. 181-190, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-6664.2008.00294.x

BASYUNI, M.; JAYUSMAN, J. Plant species diversity and cluster analysis in difference logged-over peat swamp forests in Riau, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, v. 284, p. 1-8, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/284/1/012022

BEGHAMI, Y.; KALLA, M.; VÉLA, E.; THINON, M.; BENMESSAOUD, H. Le Genévrier thurifère Juniperus thurifera L. dans les Aurès, Algérie: considérations générales, cartographie, écologie et groupements végétaux. Ecologia Mediterranea, v. 39, n. 1, p. 17-30, 2013. https://doi.org/10.3406/ecmed.2013.1288

BELHACINI, F.; FETTAH, M. A.; AOUFI, F.; BOUAZZA, M. Diversité floristique du peuplement à Phillyrea latifolia dans la forêt de Bissa: Chlef, Nord-Ouest Algérien. Journée Internationale de Biodiversité 22/5/2016. Université Mohamed Boudiaf, M’Sila (Algeria), p. 15, 2016.

BENTOUATI, A. La situation du cèdre de l’Atlas dans les Aurès (Algérie). Forêt Méditerranéenne, v. XXIX, n. 2, p. 203-208, 2008. https://www.foret-mediterraneenne.org/upload/biblio/FORET_MED_2008_2_203-208.pdf

BENTOUATI, A.; BARITEAU, M. Réflexions sur le déperissement du Cèdre de l’Atlas des Aurès (Algérie). Forêt Méditerranéenne. v. XXVII, n. 4, p. 317-322, 2006. https://www.foret-mediterraneenne.org/upload/biblio/FORET_MED_2006_4_317-322.pdf

BOUDY, P. Économie forestière nord-africaine: description forestière de l’Algérie et de la Tunisie. Paris: Larose, v. IV, 1955, 483p.

BOUNAB, S. Biodiversité végétale de la région du Hodna (M’Sila): étude phytochimique et activité biologique de quelques espèces médicinales. 132p. Thèse (Doctorat) – Faculté des Sciences de la Nature et de la Vie, Université Ferhat Abbas Sétif, Algeria, 2020. http://dspace.univ-setif.dz:8888/jspui/bitstream/123456789/3684/1/Th%C3%A9se%20Doctorat%20BOUNAB%202020.pdf

BOUNAR, R.; CHARMAT, S.; AMARA, D. G.; ADJABI, A. Analysis of species floristics within the oak forests of Guerrouche (Jijel, Algeria). Environmental & Socio-Economic Studies, v. 9, n. 3, p. 1-7. 2021. https://doi.org/10.2478/environ-2021-0013

BRADFORD, J. B.; LAUENROTH, W. K. Controls over invasion of Bromus tectorum: the importance of climate, soil, disturbance and seed availability. Journal of Vegetation Science, v. 17, n. 6, p. 693-704, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2006.tb02493.x

BRAUN-BLANQUET, J.; ROUSSINE, N.; NEGRE, R. Les groupements végétaux de la France méditerranéenne. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1952, 292p.

CANO, E.; MUSARELLA, C. M.; CANO-ORTIZ, A.; FUENTES, J. C. P.; TORRES, A. R.; GONZÁLEZ, S. D.; GOMES, C. J. P.; QUINTO-CANAS, R.; SPAMPINATO, G. Geobotanical study of the microforests of Juniperus oxycedrus subsp. badia in the Central and Southern Iberian Peninsula. Sustainability, v. 11, n. 4, p. 1-31, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041111

CANO-ORTIZ, A.; SPAMPINATO, G.; FUENTES, J. C. P.; GOMES, C. J. P.; QUINTO-CANAS, R.; CANO, E. Taxonomy, ecology and distribution of Juniperus oxycedrus L. group in the Mediterranean basin using bioclimatic, phytochemical and morphometric approaches, with special reference to the Iberian Peninsula. Forests, v. 12, p. 1-16, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12060703

CICCARELLI, D.; PICCIARELLI, P.; BEDINI, G.; SORCE, C. Mediterranean sea cliff plants: morphological and physiological responses to environmental conditions. Journal of Plant Ecology, v. 9, n. 2, p. 153-164, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtv042

DOBIGNARD, A.; CHATELAIN, C.  Synonymic and bibliographic index of North Africa plants, v. 1, 2, 3, 4 et 5. C.J.B.G, Genève, 2010-2013. http://www.ville-ge.ch/musinfo/bd/cjb/africa/

EL BAKKALI, N. Contribution à l’étude de la variabilité chez le cèdre de  l’Atlas au Maroc. 150p. Thèse (Doctorat) – Université Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah de Fès, Maroc, 2020. https://hal.science/tel-03773145/document

EMBERGER, L. Réflexions sur le spectre biologique de Raunkiaer. Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France, v. 113, n. 2, p. 147-156, 1966.

FANELLI, G.; LESTINI, M.; SAULI, A. S. Floristic gradients of herbaceous vegetation and P/N ratio in soil in a Mediterranean area. Plant Ecology, v. 194, p. 231-242, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-007-9287-8

FENNANE, M. Phytosociologie des tétraclinaies marocaines. Bulletin de l’Institut Scientifique, v. 12, p. 99-148, 1988.

GÉHU, J. M.; RIVAS MARTINEZ, S. Notions fondamentales de Phytosociologie. In: KRAMER, J. (Ed.). Berichte der Internationalen vereinigung fur vegetation skunde “Syntaxonomie”, 1981.

GILLET, F. La phytosociologie synusiale intégrée: guide méthodologique. Documents du Laboratoire d’Ecologie Végétale. France, 2000, 68p.

GNANAKUMARI, R.; VIJAYALAKSHMI, P. Generalized Jaccard similarity based recurrent DNN for virtualizing social network communities. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, v. 36, n. 3, p. 2719-2730, 2023. https://doi.org/10.32604/iasc.2023.034145

GUECHI, N. O. Études floristique et ethnobotanique du massif de Maadid (M’Sila, Algérie). 228p. Thèse (Doctorat) – Faculté des Sciences,  Université Mohamed Boudiaf, M’Sila, Algeria, 2022. http://dspace.univ-msila.dz:8080//xmlui/handle/123456789/28253

GUINOCHET, M. Phytosociologie. Paris: Masson, 1973, 228p.

HALINIARZ, M.; CHOJNACKA, S.; KWIECINSKA-POPPE, E. Low-input agriculture as a chance to preserve endangered species of segetal flora. Biology and Life Sciences Forum, v. 3, n. 1, p. 1-2, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2021-09740

HAMEL, T.; SERIDI, R.; BELAIR, G.; SLIMANI, A.; BABALI, B. Flore vasculaire rare et endémique de la péninsule de l’Edough (Nord-Est algérien). Synthèse: Revue des Sciences et de la Technologie, v. 26, p. 65-74, 2013. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/srst/article/view/117321

HAMMADA, S. Etudes sur la végétation des zones humides du Maroc: catalogue et analyse de la biodiversité floristique et identification des principaux groupements végétaux. 187p. Thèse (Doctorat) – Faculté des Sciences, Université Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco. 2007. https://rsis.ramsar.org/RISapp/files/41573399/documents/MA2375_lit180815_1.pdf

HAMMER, O. PAST: Paleontological Statistics. Reference Manual. Version 4.13 (1999-2023). Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, 2023, 306p. https://www.nhm.uio.no/english/research/resources/past/downloads/past4manual.pdf

HAMMER, O.; HARPER, D. A. T.; RYAN, P. D. Past: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, v. 4, n. 1. https://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm

HEBRARD, J. P.; LOISEL, R.; ROUX, C.; GAMILA, H.; BONIN, G. Incidence of clearing on phanerogamic and cryptogamic vegetation in South-Eastern France: disturbance indices, In: BELLAN, D.; BONIN, G.; EMIG, C. (Eds.). Functioning and Dynamics of Natural and Perturbed Ecosystems. Paris: Lavoisier, p. 747- 758, 1995.

HIEN LE, T.; OH, T.; BO, A. B.; JIA, W. Q.; CHO, K. M.; PARK, K. W. Effect of environmental factors on the germination and emergence of Erodium cicutarium. Weed & Turfgrass Science, v. 9, n. 4, p. 309-317, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5660/WTS.2020.9.4.309

IPNI. International Plant Names Index. Royal Botanic Gardens (UK), Harvard University Herbaria & Libraries (USA) and Australian National Botanic Gardens (Australia). https://www.ipni.org/

JALOBĂ, D.; GRĂDILĂ, M.; IONESCU, N. Carduus nutans and Eryngium campestre – problem weeds found in permanent grassland of Băicoi. Romanian Journal for Plant Protection, v. XI, p. 30-38, 2018. https://www.rjpp.ro/images/Archive/2018/v2/5-Carduus%20nutans_RJPP%202018.pdf

KAABECHE, M. Les groupements végétaux de la région de Bousaada (Algérie). Essai de synthèse sur la végétation steppique du Maghreb. 132p. Thèse (Doctorat) – Paris-Sud Centre d’Orsay University, Paris, France, 1990. https://www.theses.fr/1990PA112206

KARAHAN, F. Morphology,  anatomy,  palynology and achene  micromorphology of  Bellis  L. (Asteraceae) species from Turkey. Acta Botanica Croatica, v. 79, n. 1, p. 59-67, 2020. https://doi.org/10.37427/botcro-2020-006

KOLEFF, P.; GASTON, K. J.; LENNON, J. J. Measuring beta diversity for presence – absence data. Journal of Animal Ecology, v. 72, n. 3, p. 367-382, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00710.x

LACOSTE, A.; SALANON, R. Eléments de biogéographie et d’écologie. 2e edition. Paris: Armand Colin, 2005, 318p.

LARBI, R.; SAHAR-MEDDOUR, O.; BOUXIN, G.; MEDDOUR, R. Diversité floristique et phytogéographique de la cédraie du massif forestier d’Ait Ouabane (versant Nord-Oriental du Parc National du Djurdjura, Algérie). Lejeunia Revue de Botanique, v. 204, p. 1-15, 2021. https://popups.uliege.be/0457-4184/index.php?id=2388&file=1&pid=2384

LEISS, K. A.; MULLER-SCHARER, H. Adaptation of Senecio vulgaris (Asteraceae) to ruderal and agricultural habitats. American Journal of Botany, v. 88, n. 9, p. 1593-1599, 2001. https://doi.org/10.2307/3558403

LOISEL, R.; GAMILA, H. Traduction des effets du débroussaillement sur les écosystèmes forestiers et pré-forestiers par un indice de perturbation. Annales de la Société des Sciences Naturelles et d’Archéologie de Toulon et du Var, v. 45, p. 123-132, 1993.

MAGURRAN, A. E. Species abundance distributions: pattern or process? Functional Ecology, v. 19, n. 1, p. 177-181, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0269-8463.2005.00930.x

MARCON, E. Mesures de la Biodiversité. Master. Kourou, France. 2022, 292p. https://ericmarcon.github.io/MesuresBioDiv2/MesuresBD.pdf

MEDDOUR, R. La méthode phytosociologique sigmatiste ou Braun-blanqueto-tüxeniènne. Faculté des Sciences Biologiques et Agronomiques, Département des Sciences Agronomiques, Université Mouloud Mammeri de Tizi Ouzou (Algérie), 2011, 40p.

MEDIOUNI, K.; YAHI, N. Etude structurale de la série du cèdre (Cedrus atlantica Manetti) à Aït Ouabane (Djurdjura). Forêt Méditerranéenne, v. XI, n. 2 , p. 103-112, 1989. https://www.foret-mediterraneenne.org/fr/catalogue/id-380-etude-structurale-de-la-serie-du-cedre-a-ait-ouabane-djurdjura

MERABTI, K.; REBBAS, K.; AIT HAMMOU, M. Inventory of epiphytic lichens in the cedars of Ouanougha and Maadid (mounts of Hodna, Algeria). Journal of EcoAgriTourism, v. 18, n. 2, p. 11-24, 2022. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365925900_INVENTORY_OF_EPIPHYTIC_LICHENS_IN_THE_CEDARS_OF_OUANOUGHA_AND_MAADID_MOUNTS_OF_HODNA_ALGERIA_Journal_of_EcoAgriTourism

MULUNEH, M. G. Impact of climate change on biodiversity and food security: a global perspective – a review article. Agriculture & Food Security, v. 10, n. 36, p. 1-25, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-021-00318-5

NEGADI, M.; HASSANI, A.; BOUNACEUR, F.; AZZAOUI, M. E. Etude de la diversité floristique de la région d’El Bayadh, Algérie: flore rare et menacée.  Revue Ecologie-Environnement,  Tiaret University,  Algeria, v. 10, p. 50-55, 2014. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344831665_Etude_de_la_diversite_floristique_de_la_region_d27El_Bayadh_Algerie_flore_rare_et_menacee

NEGRE, R. Les thérophytes, Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France, v. 113, n. 2, 92-108, 1966. https://doi.org/10.1080/00378941.1966.10838477

OZENDA, P. Flore du Sahara. 3e Ed. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 2004, 662p.

OZENDA, P. Les Végétaux dans la biosphère. Paris: Doin ed., 1982, 432p.

QUEZEL, P. Cèdres et cédraie du pourtour méditerranéen: signification bioclimatique et phytogéographique. Forêt Méditerranéenne, v. XIX, n. 3, p. 243-260, 1998. https://www.foret-mediterraneenne.org/fr/catalogue/id-721-cedres-et-cedraies-du-pourtour-mediterraneen-signification-bioclimatique-et-phytogeographique

QUEZEL, P. L’endémisme dans la flore d’Algérie. Compte Rendu Sommaire des Séances de la Société de Biogéographie, v. 361, p. 137-149, 1964.

QUEZEL, P. Structures de végétation et flore en Afrique du Nord: leurs incidences sur les problèmes de conservation. In: REJDALI, M.; HEYWOOD, V. H. (Eds.). Conservation des Ressources Végétales, Rabat, Actes éditions, Institut agronomique et vétérinaire Hassan-II, p. 19-32, 1991.

QUEZEL, P.; BARBERO, M. Les formations à Genévriers rampants du Djurdjura: leur signification écologique, dynamique et syntaxinomique, dans une approche d’interprétation globale des cédraies kabyles. Lazaroa, v. 11, p. 85-99, 1989. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/LAZA/article/view/44580

QUEZEL, P.; SANTA, S. Nouvelle Flore de l’Algérie et des régions désertiques méridionales. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, v. 1, p. 1-565, v. 2, p. 571-1091, 1962 – 1963.

RABHI, K.; AKLI, A.; DJOUHRI, A.; YAHI, N.; BOUDEDJA, S.; MESSAOUDENE, M. Bilan et croissance des reboisements de cèdre de l’Atlas, Cedrus atlantica (Endl.) Carrière, en Algérie: cas du Djurdjura et de l’Atlas blidéen. Bois & Forêts des Tropiques, v. 337, p. 3-15, 2018. https://doi.org/10.19182/bft2018.337.a31627

RAUNKIAER, C. The Life Forms of Plants and Statistical Plant Geography. London: Oxford University Press, 1934, 632p.

SEDJAR, A. Biodiversité et dynamique de la végétation dans un écosystème forestier – Cas de djebel Boutaleb. 91p. Memory (Magister) – Faculté des Sciences de la Nature et de la Vie, Université Ferhat Abbas Sétif, Algeria, 2012, 91p. https://mmagister.univ-setif.dz/images/facultes/SNV/2012/SEDJAR%20Amina.pdf

SERGIO, F.; PEDRINI, P. Biodiversity gradients in the Alps: the overriding importance of elevation. Biodiversity and Conservation, v.16, p. 3243-3254, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9113-y

SHAH, A.; SINGH, P.; PANDEY, A.; SHARMA, A.; GARG, C.; RATHORE, P. Recommendation system using Jaccard’s similarity. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, v. 5, n. 4, p. 2882-2885, 2023. https://doi.org/10.56726/IRJMETS36220

SHAHEEN, S.; HARUN, N.; IJAZ, R.; MUKHTAR, N.; ASHFAQ, M.; BIBI, F.; ALI, M.; ABBAS, Z.; KHALID, Z. Sustainability issues in conservation of traditional medicinal herbs and their associated knowledge: a case study of District Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan. Sustainability, v. 15, n. 9, p. 1-26, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097343

SOLOMOU, A. D.; KORAKAKI, E.; AVRAMIDOU, E. V.; BOUTSIOS, S.; OIKONOMIDIS, S.; DASKALAKOU, E. Assessment of herbaceous plant composition, diversity, and indicator species in the Juniperus drupacea forest openings of the mountain Parnonas in Greece. Sustainability, v. 15, n. 18, p. 1-20, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813765

SOUAHI, H.; GACEM, R.; CHENCHOUNI, H. Variation in plant diversity along a watershed in the semi-arid lands of North Africa. Diversity, v. 14, n. 6, p. 1-20, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14060450

SOULÉ, M. E. Conservation: tactics for a constant crisis. Science, v. 253, n. 5021, p. 744-750, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.253.5021.744

TALEB, M. S.; FENNANE, M. Flora of the biological and ecological interest site (BEIS) of Tichoukt mountain (middle atlas, Morocco). Revue Nature et Technologie, v. 8, n. 2, p. 2-13, 2016. https://www.asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/40695

VERMA, A. K.; ROUT, P. R.; LEE, E.; BHUNIA, P.; BAE, J.; SUTAMPALLI, R. Y.; ZHANG, T. C.; TYAGI, R. D.; LIN, P.; CHEN, Y. Biodiversity and Sustainability. In: SURAMPALLI, R.; ZHANG, T.; GOYAL, M. K.; BRAR, S.; TYAGI, R. (Eds.). Sustainability: Fundamentals and Applications. New York: Wiley Online Library, p. 255-275, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119434016.ch12

WALTER, J. M. N. Méthodes d’étude de la végétation. Méthode du relevé floristique, Deuxième partie.  Institut de Botanique, Faculté des Sciences de la Vie, Université Louis Pasteur Strasbourg, France, 2006, 14p.

YAHI, N.; DJELLOULI, Y.; FOUCAULT, B. Diversités floristique et biogéographique des cédraies d’Algérie. Acta Botanica Gallica, v. 155, n. 3, p. 389-402, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/12538078.2008.10516119

YAICI, K. Étude floristique et ethnobotanique des plantes médicinales dans le Tell Sétifien: Forêt de Tamntout, Beni Aziz. Essai de caractérisation biologique et pharmacopée de l’espèce Erica arborea L. 179p. Thèse (Doctorat) – Faculté des Sciences de la Nature et de la Vie, Université Ferhat Abbas Sétif, Algeria, 2020. https://theses-algerie.com/2250648414928255/these-de-doctorat/universite-ferhat-abbas-setif-1/etude-floristique-et-ethnobotanique-des-plantes-medicinales-dans-le-tell-setifien-foret-de-tamntout-beni-aziz-essai-de-caracterisation-biologique-et-pharmacopee-de-l-espece-erica-arboreal-

ZEDAM, A. Etude de la flore endémique de la zone humide de Chott El Hodna: Inventaire – Préservation. 150p. Thèse (Doctorat) – Faculté des Sciences de la Nature et de la Vie, Université Ferhat Abbas Sétif, Algeria, 2015. https://tdoctorat.univ-setif.dz/2015/SNV/ZEDAM.pdf

ZEDAM, A. Etude de la productivité du cèdre de l’Atlas (Cedrus atlantica man) en fonction des caractéristiques stationnelles à Djebel Maadid (W. Bordj Bou Arreridj). (Engineer memory), National Institute of Agronomy, El Harrach-Algiers, Algeria, 1991, 61p.

ZEDAM, A.; FENNI, M. Vascular Flora Analysis in the Southern Part of Chott El Hodna Wetland, Algeria: An Advanced Research. In: SHRESTHA, H. L. (Ed.). Challenging Issues on Environment and Earth Science, v. 9, p. 88-100, 2021. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/ciees/v9/13218D

 

 

 

Received on November 27, 2023

Returned for adjustments on January 25, 2024

Received with adjustments on January 26, 2024

Accepted on February 17, 2024

Sair da versão mobile